Skip to content

Maintained conclusion register

Reference contents · Glossary · Evidence method · Sources

This is a question-routing index, not a second set of judgments. The linked chapter owns each conclusion and its supporting, conflicting and limited evidence. Qualitative grades are editorial shorthand, not numerical scores or formal GRADE ratings. Checked 2026-10-02.

Aerobic fitness, volume and easy intensity

Conclusion Grade Original-source records
PHY-C01 — Sustainable cycling power is the interaction of VO2max, the fraction that can be held, and efficiency, not an FTP trait. Strong evidence PHY01, PHY02, PHY09, PHY14
PHY-C02 — Short-term VO2max gains are mostly oxygen delivery; extraction is already high in well-trained athletes. Moderate evidence PHY02, PHY03, PHY04, PHY05, PHY06, PHY07, PHY08
PHY-C03 — Critical power, MLSS, second thresholds and FTP are related and not interchangeable. Strong evidence PHY10, PHY11, PHY12, PHY13, PHY40, PHY41, PHY42
PHY-C04 — Mitochondrial and capillary gains follow training load, not a unique Zone 2 pathway. Moderate evidence PHY23, PHY24, PHY25, PHY26, PHY27, PHY56
PHY-C05 — Lower gains at higher baseline fitness and a null study-level volume regression are not a randomized weekly-hour dose-response trial. Moderate evidence PHY23, PHY28, PHY29, PHY30, PHY34, PHY60, PHY61
PHY-C06 — Progress volume by recoverable steps; a universal 10% rule is not validated for cyclists. Mostly coaching practice PHY46, PHY47, PHY48, PHY49, PHY50, PHY51
PHY-C07 — One long ride and two shorter rides of equal time are not known to be equal training stimuli. Plausible but uncertain PHY30, PHY57, PHY21, PHY19
PHY-C08 — No retrieved direct longitudinal comparison ranks 55-60% versus 65-75% FTP. Whether those bands differ in performance adaptation is uncertain. Fixed percentages of maximum misclassify intensity domains on separate evidence. Plausible but uncertain PHY55, PHY45, PHY38, PHY39, PHY40
PHY-C09 — Research Zone 1, cycling Zone 2 and popular Zone 2 are different constructs. Strong evidence PHY31, PHY32, PHY56, PHY13
PHY-C10 — Riding easier as weekly hours rise is a recovery-oriented coaching choice, not a proven workload rule. Mostly coaching practice PHY33, PHY30, PHY22

Distribution, periodization and recovery

Conclusion Grade Original-source records
TID-C01 — 80/20 describes a common high-volume session pattern; it is not an experimentally identified optimum for every volume, phase, or event. Moderate evidence TID01, TID02, TID15, TID36, TID53
TID-C02 — Polarized training has not been shown superior to pyramidal or other non-polarized distributions for trained cyclists' time-trial performance; a small VO2peak edge and older threshold-heavy contrasts are narrower claims. Moderate evidence TID04, TID05, TID06, TID07, TID08, TID09, TID10, TID11, TID12, TID13
TID-C03 — Session-goal, time-in-zone, and 3/5/7-zone labels are different measurements and must not be treated as interchangeable prescriptions. Strong evidence TID01, TID03, TID15
TID-C04 — When load is matched, ordering 4-, 8-, and 16-minute mesocycles as longer/lower-intensity first versus shorter/higher-intensity first has not been shown to matter over 12 weeks. Neither Sylta order is a pure VO2-before-threshold or threshold-before-VO2 sequence. Elaborate base-build-peak or reverse sequencing is not a demonstrated requirement. Moderate evidence TID17, TID41, TID42, TID43
TID-C05 — Short HIT or moderate-intensity blocks can improve well-trained cyclists, but superiority over even spacing is conflicting and not established. Plausible but uncertain TID18, TID19, TID20, TID21, TID22, TID44, TID45, TID46
TID-C06 — About two hard endurance sessions per week is a workable and commonly studied dose, not an experimentally proven optimum versus one or three. Mostly coaching practice TID23, TID37, TID38, TID39, TID47, TID48
TID-C07 — About 48 hours is a reasonable default gap after severe work based on autonomic recovery summaries, not a performance law; multi-hour easy rides are training, not free recovery. Moderate evidence TID24, TID25, TID26, TID49
TID-C08 — A universal maintenance minimum and an obligatory mathematical deload cannot be prescribed; pre-event tapers have better evidence than routine 3:1 unload weeks. Moderate evidence TID27, TID28, TID29, TID30, TID31, TID32, TID33, TID34, TID50, TID56
TID-C09 — Distribution should change with volume, days, phase, and event, but specific zone percentages for amateur cyclists are not fixed by factorial trials. Plausible but uncertain TID15, TID16, TID35, TID36, TID53, TID54

VO₂-focused intervals

Conclusion Grade Original-source records
INT-C01 — In one well-trained cyclist cohort, higher mean %VO2max during 5x8 min intervals at PO40min was associated with larger gains in VO2max, Wmax, power at 4 mmol, and a composite index. This is not proof that raising the fraction causes the gain. Moderate evidence INT01, INT24, INT46
INT-C02 — Time ≥90% VO2max is a noisy acute marker, not a validated surrogate for subsequent adaptation. Moderate evidence INT01, INT21, INT22, INT25, INT33, INT40, INT46
INT-C03 — Effort-matched 30/15 series can outperform 4x5 min intervals on several outcomes in trained male cyclists, but this is not a universal short-versus-long rule, and the 2015 trial did not measure the proposed time≥90% mechanism. Moderate evidence INT03, INT04, INT05, INT06, INT21, INT26, INT41, INT54
INT-C04 — Ordering 4x16, 4x8, and 4x4 over 12 weeks does not detectably change outcomes when load is matched. Moderate evidence INT09, INT10, INT48
INT-C05 — A unique 4-8 minute sweet spot is not established for well-trained cyclists. It is supported only as an intensity-by-duration interaction in one recreational cohort. Plausible but uncertain INT12, INT13, INT09, INT10
INT-C06 — Exact 5x5 and isolated 1-minute VO2 formats still lack a trained-cyclist performance head-to-head. 40/20 has one 4-week randomized comparison against 4x8 that did not separate VO2peak; calling any of these optimal remains coaching practice. Mostly coaching practice INT14, INT17, INT42, INT46, INT13, INT12, INT53
INT-C07 — Fixed %FTP, %MAP, or %VO2max anchors are weak. Self-paced maximal effort raises acute time near VO2max, especially for longer intervals. Moderate evidence INT06, INT11, INT34, INT44
INT-C08 — Within-interval power variation sometimes raises acute time near VO2max and sometimes does not. No retrieved trial shows this changes adaptation. Plausible but uncertain INT07, INT08, INT02, INT21
INT-C09 — Near-maximal intervals are not uniquely required for endurance gains in well-trained cyclists. RPE and breathlessness are not measurements of %VO2max. Moderate evidence INT37, INT38, INT39, INT01, INT17
INT-C10 — Maximal aerobic power is test-protocol dependent, so an unnamed %MAP target is not portable across ramp designs. Moderate evidence INT35, INT36

Threshold, durability and long rides

Conclusion Grade Original-source records
DUR-C01 — FTP, CP, MLSS and RCP correlate at group level but are not interchangeable for an individual. Strong evidence DUR01, DUR02, DUR03, DUR04, DUR05, DUR06, DUR07, DUR08, DUR09, DUR10
DUR-C02 — Sustainable power is raised by more than one intensity domain. A threshold-heavy week is a viable stimulus, not a proven best or exclusive system. Cove 2025's null polarised versus non-polarised contrast is not a measured 80/20 or pyramidal comparison. Moderate evidence DUR11, DUR12, DUR13, DUR14, DUR15, DUR16, DUR17, DUR18, DUR19, DUR20, DUR21
DUR-C03 — Named FTP recipes and a uniquely efficient sweet-spot band are coaching practice, not trial-established optima. Mostly coaching practice DUR11, DUR15, DUR16, DUR22
DUR-C04 — Threshold and short time-trial power fall after prior work; absolute 1500/2000/3000 kJ cut-points are not universal. Strong evidence DUR27, DUR28, DUR29, DUR31, DUR32, DUR34, DUR36, DUR40, DUR51
DUR-C05 — Fresh FTP or VO2max does not fully identify who retains power after prior work. Moderate evidence DUR32, DUR33, DUR34, DUR35, DUR39, DUR41, DUR30
DUR-C06 — Durability can improve. Heavy strength twice weekly for 12 weeks improved 5-min power after 185 min in one controlled cyclist study; that does not prove an effect independent of fresh fitness. The optimal endurance-session type is uncertain. No matched fresh-versus-late interval trial was retrieved. Plausible but uncertain DUR43, DUR44, DUR45, DUR46, DUR47, DUR42, DUR30, DUR33
DUR-C07 — No controlled evidence shows fatigue-state intervals improve late-race performance more than the same intervals done fresh. A higher recovery cost is a plausible risk, not a matched early-versus-late result. Mostly coaching practice DUR32, DUR34, DUR30, DUR50, DUR40
DUR-C08 — No trial establishes an optimal long-ride duration or weekly share. A 25-40% share of cycling time is an untested coaching span, not a ceiling. One example that already includes strength inside 7/9/12 h is 120/390, 180/480 and 210/660 cycling minutes (~31%, ~38%, ~32%). Mostly coaching practice DUR57, DUR58, DUR23, DUR30, DUR39
DUR-C09 — Carbohydrate availability can change the moderate-to-heavy transition and estimated CP, but that is not structural durability. Main 2026 is depletion plus 24 h of ≤1 vs ≥9 g/kg CHO, not a skipped breakfast. Norte 2026 used 3 h at 95% GET, not FTP; 120 g/h beat water for preserving CP and raised some GI scores versus water, while 120 vs 60 g/h was not significant and 90 g/h was not tested. Neither universal tolerance nor a fasted long ride as a durability method is supported. Moderate evidence DUR51, DUR52, DUR27, DUR28, DUR35, DUR53, DUR54, DUR55, DUR56, DUR49, DUR50

Fueling and energy availability

Conclusion Grade Original-source records
FUEL-C01 — Carbohydrate versus none during prolonged exercise is strong evidence. The hourly target is moderate evidence. Superiority of 100-120 g/h over 60-90 g/h is plausible but uncertain; high dose is optional, not mandatory. The claim grade is Moderate because the practical conclusion is the hourly/high-dose claim, not the placebo contrast. Moderate evidence FUEL01, FUEL02, FUEL03, FUEL04, FUEL05, FUEL06, FUEL07
FUEL-C02 — Glucose or maltodextrin plus fructose, via SGLT1 and GLUT5, raises exogenous oxidation above a single-source ceiling; 2:1 and about 1:0.8 both work, and ratio differences are smaller than mixed versus glucose alone. Strong evidence FUEL03, FUEL08, FUEL09, FUEL10, FUEL11, FUEL12, FUEL13, FUEL14, FUEL15
FUEL-C03 — Glucose plus sucrose supplying the same overall 2:1 glucose:fructose as free glucose plus fructose oxidised similarly in Trommelen 2017 (10 trained men, 108 g/h; 0.6 g/min glucose + 1.2 g/min sucrose vs 1.2 glucose + 0.6 fructose). Sucrose alone was not tested in that comparison and is not claimed to match a free mix. Separately, sucrose versus glucose protects liver glycogen during moderate cycling and speeds liver, not muscle, repletion. Table sugar is a cheap legitimate carbohydrate, not a proven sports-drink clone. Moderate evidence FUEL16, FUEL17, FUEL18, FUEL19, FUEL20, FUEL21
FUEL-C04 — Oxidation, absorption, and tolerance are separable. Short gut training can reduce symptoms in some runners but does not reliably unlock 120 g/h as a performance requirement. Moderate evidence FUEL09, FUEL15, FUEL22, FUEL23, FUEL24, FUEL25, FUEL26, FUEL27
FUEL-C05 — In-ride and around-session carbohydrate mainly protects session quality and next-day work; it is not evidence of a separate structural adaptation from extra carbohydrate. Strong evidence FUEL26, FUEL28, FUEL29, FUEL31, FUEL32, FUEL33, FUEL34, FUEL35, FUEL05
FUEL-C06 — Periodised carbohydrate restriction has not reliably improved endurance performance in trained athletes. Gejl 2021 SMD 0.17 (95% CI -0.15 to 0.49) is an imprecise null, not proof of zero or of universal no benefit. Not fasting quality sessions is a risk-oriented practical choice, not proof of a null. A benefit of train-low remains plausible but uncertain. Moderate evidence FUEL28, FUEL29, FUEL30, FUEL36, FUEL37, FUEL38, FUEL39, FUEL40, FUEL41, FUEL42, FUEL43, FUEL44, FUEL45, FUEL46, FUEL47, FUEL48, FUEL49, FUEL58
FUEL-C07 — When rapid glycogen restoration is the goal, about 1.2 g/kg/h early is the rate at which muscle resynthesis is described as maximised. It is not a minimum after every ride. Sucrose or glucose-fructose favours liver glycogen. Even 10 g/kg over 12 h may not fully restore muscle glycogen. Sollie 2023 is design-only here; the title is not an outcome. Moderate evidence FUEL21, FUEL50, FUEL51, FUEL52, FUEL53, FUEL77, FUEL78
FUEL-C08 — Endurance protein needs are credibly about 1.4-2.1 g/kg/day, with point estimates near 1.6-1.8 on hard days; timing is secondary to the daily total unless carbohydrate is inadequate. Moderate evidence FUEL53, FUEL54, FUEL55, FUEL56, FUEL57, FUEL58, FUEL59
FUEL-C09 — Fluid and sodium replacement must be individualised. Overdrinking, not a missed universal sodium dose, is the dominant cause of exercise-associated hyponatremia. Strong evidence FUEL15, FUEL60, FUEL61, FUEL62, FUEL63, FUEL64
FUEL-C10 — Low energy availability and REDs can limit health and training, but screening is not diagnosis and there is no universal caloric threshold. The share of recovery limited by intake versus programming is not a known percentage. Strong evidence FUEL69, FUEL70, FUEL71, FUEL72, FUEL73, FUEL74, FUEL75, FUEL35, FUEL44

Sleep, heat and iron

Conclusion Grade Original-source records
REC-C01 — Acute sleep loss impairs physical performance, including endurance; total deprivation and late restriction are clearer harms than every partial short night, and afternoon tests are more vulnerable. Strong evidence REC02, REC03, REC04, REC06, REC01
REC-C02 — Nine hours plus a nap is not a proven requirement. Elite athletes often sleep about 6.5-7 h and report needing about 8.3 h; short sleep is strongly tied to schedule, not a demonstrated extra biological need from training hours. Moderate evidence REC10, REC11, REC12, REC13, REC01
REC-C03 — A few nights of sleep extension can maintain endurance time-trial performance better than normal or restricted sleep in a small cyclist crossover; basketball and tennis extension trials do not establish a cycling adaptation dose. Moderate evidence REC05, REC08, REC07, REC09, REC01
REC-C04 — Daytime naps can improve acute physical performance and perceived fatigue, especially 30 to <60 min with a buffer before testing; 20-30 min naps do not reliably avoid sleep inertia, and cycling time-trial evidence is thin. Moderate evidence REC14, REC15, REC16, REC17, REC20, REC21, REC18, REC19
REC-C05 — Severe sleep loss lowers muscle protein synthesis in young adults, and endurance overreaching can reduce objective sleep efficiency, but this is not evidence that ordinary short nights block VO2max or FTP adaptation. Moderate evidence REC22, REC23, REC24, REC25
REC-C06 — Heat acclimation improves performance and tolerance in the heat more consistently than in cool conditions. Post-exercise sauna or hot-water immersion has uncertain performance effects in meta-analysis. Strong evidence REC28, REC29, REC30, REC31, REC33, REC37, REC41, REC42, REC57
REC-C07 — Plasma-volume expansion within days is not the same as a rise in haemoglobin mass over weeks. A lower haemoglobin concentration after heat or training is often dilution. Heat-driven erythropoiesis is not established as the same mechanism as hypoxia. Strong evidence REC36, REC29, REC43, REC35, REC44, REC45, REC47, REC48, REC49, REC53, REC54
REC-C08 — Validated heat doses must be stated exactly, and sauna is not hot-water immersion. No retrieved trial specifically tested 3x45 min/week sauna, so that dose should not be declared effective or ineffective. Jenkins 2025 tested 45 min hot-water immersion at 5 sessions/week, a different modality and frequency. Daily sauna has not been shown head-to-head to beat three sauna sessions for the same outcome. Moderate evidence REC39, REC35, REC52, REC56, REC45, REC51, REC49, REC41
REC-C09 — Heat acclimation reduces heat strain but remains a stressor. Dehydration is not an effective haemoglobin-mass strategy. A studied hot-water block did not worsen sleep as an overreaching marker. Maximal heat is not a default amateur prescription, and adaptations decay within days to two weeks. Strong evidence REC33, REC34, REC56, REC58, REC31, REC49, REC54
REC-C10 — No indiscriminate supplementation in an iron-replete athlete. Treat documented deficiency under professional assessment, not a ferritin-alone rule. Acute-phase ferritin can mask deficiency; the clinician uses haemoglobin, ferritin, transferrin saturation or other iron markers, inflammation, and context. A normal or high ferritin alone does not exclude deficiency or make treatment categorically contraindicated. Cycling causes less foot-strike haemolysis than running, and one temperate bout loses little sweat iron, but hepcidin versus sweat versus menstrual loss is sex- and context-dependent, not a universal ranking. Strong evidence REC59, REC60, REC62, REC63, REC64, REC66, REC68, REC69, REC70, REC71, REC72, REC76

Strength, warm-ups and mobility

Conclusion Grade Original-source records
STR-C01 — Heavy lower-body strength can improve cycling time-trial or time-to-exhaustion performance without a reliable VO2max increase. Moderate evidence STR01, STR02, STR03, STR07, STR09, STR11, STR16, STR17, STR06
STR-C02 — Economy and anaerobic power are the more consistent companions of that performance effect; threshold and VO2max are not guaranteed. Moderate evidence STR01, STR05, STR07, STR09, STR10
STR-C03 — Sprint and plyometric work are task-specific and are not a proven replacement for heavy strength. Moderate evidence STR14, STR15, STR19, STR20, STR18, STR55
STR-C04 — Low-load core and activation routines are not a required performance method. There is no adequate evidence that they correct a claimed imbalance or prevent cycling injury; that gap is not proof that every such routine is ineffective. Moderate evidence STR11, STR37, STR38, STR39
STR-C05 — Concurrent interference is real for explosive strength and next-day peak power, but a 6-hour cyclist rule is not established. Moderate evidence STR22, STR23, STR24, STR25, STR26, STR27, STR28, STR29, STR30
STR-C06 — Two weekly sessions can build the strength effect and one session often maintains it. Those minutes and their recovery cost count inside a 7/9/12 h total budget by replacing easy cycling (examples 390+30, 480+60, 660+60 min), or add about 1-1.5 h if the hours were cycling-only. This is a supported implementation, not a 30-minute optimum. Moderate evidence STR02, STR04, STR12, STR13, STR21, STR52
STR-C07 — A short cycling warm-up changes output; prolonged static stretching can impair isolated force; band activation is not required. Strong evidence STR40, STR41, STR42, STR45, STR46, STR47, STR48
STR-C08 — Strength, mobility, and activation have not been shown in adequate cyclist trials to prevent cycling injury or correct imbalances. Mostly coaching practice STR31, STR32, STR33, STR34, STR35, STR36, STR60, STR61

Load and adaptation monitoring

Conclusion Grade Original-source records
MON-C01 — TSS, NP, IF, CTL, ATL, and TSB are deterministic bookkeeping models. One hour at the entered FTP is 100 TSS by construction. CTL is not measured fitness. Default 42- and 7-day constants are vendor conventions, not fitted biological time constants. Strong evidence MON01, MON02, MON03, MON04, MON05, MON17, MON18
MON-C02 — Equal TSS is not equal physiological stress. Steady-state TSS scales with IF squared, so the same TSS can represent very different kilojoules. A high FTP setting systematically understates TSS and inflates prescribed zones. Strong evidence MON01, MON02, MON04, MON19, MON20, MON24
MON-C03 — Hours, kilojoules, heart-rate TRIMP, and session-RPE answer different questions. They correlate, especially when duration is shared, but are not interchangeable and should not be converted by a universal equation. Moderate evidence MON08, MON09, MON10, MON12, MON16, MON18, MON19, MON22, MON23, MON49, MON50, MON51, MON53
MON-C04 — TSS and related impulses show dose-response associations with fitness changes in some observational blocks. That does not validate CTL targets, ramp-rate rules, or the default 42/7 constants as decision thresholds. Moderate evidence MON03, MON04, MON10, MON14, MON15, MON16, MON17, MON18
MON-C05 — Acute:chronic workload ratios are not established causal injury models. TSB is a description of recent versus chronic load timing, not a measurement of readiness or injury risk. Strong evidence MON03, MON05, MON13, MON59
MON-C06 — Whether a program is working is judged from standardized performance beyond test noise, not from a rising CTL. A 20-minute FTP test can miss a real maximal-lactate-steady-state change. Strong evidence MON03, MON16, MON27
MON-C07 — A 20-minute test is reliable for tracking threshold-domain performance. Ninety-five percent of that power, critical power, and 3-minute end-test power are related but not interchangeable, and none measures VO2max. W' and 3-minute work above end-test power are too noisy or biased for week-to-week decisions. Strong evidence MON24, MON25, MON26, MON27, MON28, MON29, MON30, MON31, MON32, MON33, MON34, MON35, MON36, MON37, MON38, MON52
MON-C08 — Heart rate at fixed power, decoupling, resting heart rate, and HRV can show multi-week trends but are too noisy and confounded for single-day pass/fail decisions. The 5% decoupling rule is coaching practice, not a trial endpoint. Moderate evidence MON05, MON06, MON40, MON41, MON48, MON54, MON55, MON56
MON-C09 — Subjective wellness is often more sensitive to acute load than common objective markers. HRV-guided training has small, often non-significant group effects on performance. A composite of HRV, resting heart rate, and wellness is more defensible than HRV alone and is not proven superior to a well-built fixed plan. Moderate evidence MON39, MON42, MON43, MON44, MON45, MON46, MON47, MON57, MON58
MON-C10 — When metrics conflict, the repeated performance test and the internal response outrank the smoothed external-load score. The exact weekly checklist is a practical synthesis, not a tested package. Moderate evidence MON13, MON19, MON27, MON39, MON40